The patent-pending components of PPPM2.0 were shared privately with over 200 senior executives, who opted-in, most with over 15 years experience at large to medium-sized firms. Their backgrounds include Financial Services, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Services and Technology. Results are as follows:
"It injects more structure, control and accountability. It provides key visibility on statuses, dependencies and risks. It is easier to train non-technical people and scales quickly. A very thoughtful, structured and insightful approach."
(Senior Exec. Healthcare Operations)
| Questions | Average Score |
|---|---|
| Is your overall impression favourable? | 4.1/5 = 82% |
| It scales better than alternatives. | 3.9/5 = 78% |
| Issues and depthN dependencies are updated real-time, providing advance notice of bottlenecks. | 4.6/5 = 92% |
| It improves scheduling/timelines; advanced notice reduces delays thus producing lower and more accurate budgets real-time. | 4.5/5 = 90% |
| It is easy for PMs to create dependencies. | 4.0/5 = 80% |
| It improves a PM's ability to manage projects effectively. | 4.4/5 = 88% |
| It is easy for Teams to understand Kanban-C. | 4.2/5 = 84% |
| It is easy for Teams to use Kanban-C. | 4.0/5 = 80% |
| It provides completeness: No need to combine Kanban-C with Scrum or JIT. | 3.7/5 = 74% |
| It improves controls over traditional Kanban. | 4.6/5 = 92% |